Legislature(1997 - 1998)
1998-05-12 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1998-05-12 House Journal Page 3897 SB 105 The following, which was advanced to third reading from the May 11, 1998 First Supplemental calendar (page 3826), was read the third time: HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 105(FIN) am H "An Act relating to legislative and executive branch ethics; relating to campaign finances for candidates for state or municipal office; relating to the conduct and regulation of lobbyists with respect to public officials; relating to the filing of disclosures by certain state employees and officials; making a conforming amendment to the definition of 'public official' for employment security statutes; and providing for an effective date." Representative Brice moved and asked unanimous consent that he be allowed to abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and Representative Brice was required to vote. Representative Elton moved and asked unanimous consent that HCS CSSB 105(FIN) am H be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 8. There being no objection, it was so ordered. 1998-05-12 House Journal Page 3898 SB 105 Amendment No. 8 was offered by Representative Elton: Page 11, following line 20: Insert a new bill section to read: "*Sec. 13. AS 24.45.121 is amended by adding a new subsection to read: (d) A lobbyist or a business in which a lobbyist has a controlling interest may not enter into a contract to provide goods or services to a campaign committee of a candidate for governor, lieutenant governor, or the legislature or to a political party as defined in AS 15.13.400 if the lobbyist has registered or is required to register as a lobbyist under AS 24.45.041 during the calendar year. This subsection does not (1) apply to a volunteer lobbyist described in AS 24.45.161(a)(1) or a person who is a representational lobbyist under regulations of the commission; or (2) prohibit a lobbyist from making personal contributions to a candidate as authorized by AS 15.13 or personally advocating on behalf of a candidate." Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. Page 58, line 30: Delete "104" Insert "105" Page 58, line 31: Delete "19, 61, 104, and 105" Insert "20, 62, 105, and 106" Page 59, line 2: Delete "Sections 11-18, 20-60, and 62-103" Insert "Sections 11-19, 21-61, and 63-104" 1998-05-12 House Journal Page 3899 SB 105 Representative Elton moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 8 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 8 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 105(FIN) am H Second Reading Amendment No. 8 YEAS: 21 NAYS: 17 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Austerman, Berkowitz, Croft, Davies, Elton, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Martin, Moses, Phillips, Porter, Therriault, Williams Nays: Barnes, Brice, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Hanley, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Ryan, Sanders, Vezey Absent: Nicholia, Rokeberg Kohring changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Dyson changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Barnes changed from "Yea" to "Nay". James changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Masek changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Bunde changed from "Yea" to "Nay". And so, Amendment No. 8 was adopted. The question being: "Shall HCS CSSB 105(FIN) am H pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 105(FIN) am H Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 37 NAYS: 1 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 2 1998-05-12 House Journal Page 3900 SB 105 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Berkowitz, Brice, Bunde, Cowdery, Croft, Davies, Davis, Dyson, Elton, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Joule, Kelly, Kemplen, Kohring, Kookesh, Kott, Kubina, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Phillips, Porter, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams Nays: Ogan Absent: Nicholia, Rokeberg And so, HCS CSSB 105(FIN) am H passed the House. Representative Porter moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Porter moved and asked unanimous consent that the House rescind previous action in passing HCS CSSB 105(FIN) am H. Objection was heard. Representative Ryan placed a call of the House and lifted the call. The question being: "Shall the House rescind previous action in passing HCS CSSB 105(FIN) am H?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 105(FIN) am H Third Reading Rescind previous action in passing YEAS: 25 NAYS: 14 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Therriault, Vezey, Williams Nays: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Hudson, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Martin, Moses, Nicholia, Sanders 1998-05-12 House Journal Page 3901 SB 105 Absent: Kubina And so, the motion passed and the following was again before the House in third reading: HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 105(FIN) am H "An Act relating to legislative and executive branch ethics; relating to campaign finances for candidates for state or municipal office; relating to the conduct and regulation of lobbyists with respect to public officials; relating to the filing of disclosures by certain state employees and officials; making a conforming amendment to the definition of 'public official' for employment security statutes; and providing for an effective date." Representative Porter moved and asked unanimous consent that HCS CSSB 105(FIN) am H be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of rescinding previous action in adopting Amendment No. 8. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall HCS CSSB 105(FIN) am H be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of rescinding previous action in adopting Amendment No. 8?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 105(FIN) am H Third Reading Return to Second/Rescind previous action/Amendment No. 8 YEAS: 27 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams Nays: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Martin, Moses, Nicholia And so, the motion passed. 1998-05-12 House Journal Page 3902 SB 105 The question being: "Shall the House rescind previous action in adopting Amendment No. 8?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 105(FIN) am H Second Reading Rescind previous action/Amendment No. 8 YEAS: 26 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams Nays: Berkowitz, Brice, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Hudson, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Martin, Moses, Nicholia Absent: Croft And so, the motion passed. Representative Sanders placed a call of the House. The call was satisfied. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 8 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 105(FIN) am H Second Reading Amendment No. 8 YEAS: 18 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cowdery, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Hudson, Ivan, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kott, Kubina, Martin, Moses, Nicholia, Williams Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, James, Kelly, Kohring, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey 1998-05-12 House Journal Page 3903 SB 105 And so, Amendment No. 8 was not adopted. The question being: "Shall HCS CSSB 105(FIN) am H pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 105(FIN) am H Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 40 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Berkowitz, Brice, Bunde, Cowdery, Croft, Davies, Davis, Dyson, Elton, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Joule, Kelly, Kemplen, Kohring, Kookesh, Kott, Kubina, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Nicholia, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams And so, HCS CSSB 105(FIN) am H passed the House. Representative Porter moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HCS CSSB 105(FIN) am H was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.